Can the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score Be Used to Diagnose Children With Liver Fibrosis?

OBJECTIVES: The noninvasive Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score is used in adults with liver fibrosis as a diagnostic aid. The ELF score combines 3 serum markers of extracellular matrix remodeling and fibrogenesis: hyaluronic acid (HA), the N-terminal pro-peptide of collagen type III (PIIINP), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1). We aimed to evaluate the clinical use of the ELF score in children. METHODS AND RESULTS: A reference interval for the ELF score was established using 343 liver-healthy children ages 6 to 17 years. The median ELF score of 8.9 in healthy children was significantly increased compared with healthy adults. ELF scores increased significantly in both female and male healthy controls with peak levels at puberty, driven by elevated levels of HA and PIIINP likely explained by increased growth. If adult normal values were applied to the group of liver-healthy children, only 6.4% were in the normal range. Prospectively, we analysed ELF scores in patients with possible or confirmed liver fibrosis because of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). All ELF scores in children with ARPKD were within the reference intervals generated from the group of healthy children. CONCLUSIONS: The usual diagnostic cut-off ranges for the ELF score in adults are not applicable; instead age and gender-appropriate cut-off values should be used in children. The clinical value of ELF scores in children is questionable as children during pubertal growth showed elevated ELF scores and patients with ARPKD and liver fibrosis showed normal levels.

Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work-up.

BACKGROUND: When initiating the Danish vaccination program against COVID-19, the incidence of anaphylaxis was estimated to be 10 times higher compared to other virus-based vaccines. In this study, we present data on patients referred with suspected allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. The main purpose of the study is to investigate the incidence and severity of the allergic reactions, and to evaluate the safety of revaccination. METHODS: All patients in the region of Southern Denmark with case histories of allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines in a defined period are included in this study. Diagnostic work up consisted of a detailed case history, evaluation of Brighton level of diagnostic certainty and World Allergy Organization grade of anaphylaxis and skin prick testing- and basophil histamine release testing with COVID-19 vaccines and relevant drug excipients. Patients were revaccinated at the Allergy Center when possible. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients are included in this study. In 199,377 doses administered, nine patients fulfilled the criteria of anaphylaxis when using the Brighton Criteria (incidence being 45 per million). Of 55 patients with reactions to the first dose, 52 patients were revaccinated without adverse reactions. We found no proven cases of immediate anaphylaxis due to COVID-19 vaccines. By skin prick test, we diagnosed three patients with drug excipient allergy and further a patient with mastocytosis was found. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylactic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines are rare and the incidence is similar to what is seen with other virus-based vaccines. Revaccination is safe in the majority of patients; however, allergological evaluation is important since some prove to have drug excipient allergy.